Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Item/meta"

From TheKolWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m (wrong part)
 
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
Is the Go Back link really needed? the data pages are all subpages so have their own wiki generated back link already, having two back links on the page is unecessary. [[User:Discordance|Discordance]] 08:54, 15 November 2006 (CST)
 
Is the Go Back link really needed? the data pages are all subpages so have their own wiki generated back link already, having two back links on the page is unecessary. [[User:Discordance|Discordance]] 08:54, 15 November 2006 (CST)
*Yes, it is necessary - otherwise, the pages will all be marked as [[Special:Lonelypages|orphaned]]. --{{User:Quietust/sig}} 09:44, 15 November 2006 (CST)
+
*Yes, it is necessary - otherwise, the pages will all be marked as [[Special:Deadendpages|dead-end]]. --{{User:Quietust/sig}} 09:44, 15 November 2006 (CST)

Latest revision as of 15:45, 15 November 2006

Should this includeonly a "Datapages"/"Data Pages" category, to clear all these pages out of "uncategorized pages" (which i tend to use to monitor the creation of new pages, etc.) ? --JRSiebz (|§|) 17:52, 8 November 2006 (CST)

  • Sure, once we decide on what to call the category. --Quietust (t|c) 18:33, 8 November 2006 (CST)
  • It is done - they now belong to Category:Data Pages. --Quietust (t|c) 13:21, 9 November 2006 (CST)

Is the Go Back link really needed? the data pages are all subpages so have their own wiki generated back link already, having two back links on the page is unecessary. Discordance 08:54, 15 November 2006 (CST)

  • Yes, it is necessary - otherwise, the pages will all be marked as dead-end. --Quietust (t|c) 09:44, 15 November 2006 (CST)