Talk:Ravioli Shurikens

From TheKolWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

I took the liberty of restarting the discussion of this skill, we need to spade for the new damage cap and gather a list of new combat stuff. --Urutsini 02:56, 13 April 2008 (CDT)

With +25 general spell damage I did not receive a "stuff goes everywhere" type message, but with +30 general spell damage I did get such a message. So the cap is definitely in the range 25-29, and most likely is 25 exactly, but I don't have a +1 spell damage item to test with right now. --Frazzlewrack 13:37, 16 April 2008 (CDT)

Got a corn holder and tested with +26 spell damage. Received the overstuffed message, so the new damage cap must be +25, and I am updating the article page to reflect that. --Frazzlewrack 10:02, 17 April 2008 (CDT)

Is there a elemental cap now, or a myst one? Or is that still the same?--Cheese 02:17, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Testing at 1, 100, 215, and 453 Mysticality showed identical results to the damage formula of Minor Ray of Something. The rest of the spells probably have identical formulas, but I'll check just to be sure. --TechSmurf 08:18, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

+55 spell damage, sauceror, no % bonus equipped. 12 casts. 43 43 38 crit 60 38 42 43 41 crit 56 38 38 40

No recoil, no effect, it did give the "overloaded" message. Sooo... that means the damage cap for Pastamancers is just that, a damage cap, and doesn't give any noticeable effect back.--Arashmin 05:59, 31 October 2009 (UTC)


EVERYTHING BELOW THIS LINE IS FROM THE DISCUSSION OF Minor Ray of Something:

Minor Ray of Something

"Frozen Cornish Game Hens" may be a reference to a Mythbusters episode which involved throwing dead chickens (frozen and thawed) at a plane, I think. --Corellie 15:37, 28 August 2006 (CDT)

  • More likely that it references the original chicken gun (and attendant urban legend) that the Mythbusters episode was simulating. --Jonrock 19:38, 13 April 2007 (CDT)
  • A quote from the film Anchorman is something along the lines of "pooping a Cornish Game Hen"--Sir Spanky 13:33, 2 November 2007 (CDT)

Spell interferance?

You call forth a Ray of Steam, which hits your opponent for 30 damage. You find it very difficult to control the Ray, and stuff sort of goes everywhere.

I'm getting the same kind of results wherever I try the spell, even low-level places like the treasury. Is this new? I don't seem to remember it before NS-13.--Munkel (talk) 10:33, 25 June 2007 (CDT)

I was just about to say the same thing. --wexer9 16:52, 25 June 2007 (CDT)

It would seem it doesn't give the message when you're using a chefstaff. Perhaps it allows for greater control of the ray? Whatever the case, I didn't notice any extra damage from wielding one other than that warrented by the + spell damage of the chefstaff itself, but I could be wrong. I'm not enough of a spade to test it very well.--Munkel (talk) 20:30, 25 June 2007 (CDT)

I just got the message with a Staff of the Short Order Cook equipped. --Lordhed 14:49, 26 June 2007 (CDT)

I think its based on spell damage and the spell its self. for example, when I have both the stainless-steel scarf and a kickback cook I get the message, but if I only have one equipped I don't get the message.--Flyinglama 21:01, 1 July 2007 (CDT)

the quantitative maximum bonus i.e. +x where x is a number not a percent, for this skill is +20.--Flyinglama 17:49, 2 July 2007 (CDT)

Question. Post NS13, when you cast a sauceror spell with its damage capped, it appears to have different effects depending on whether you are currently playing as a sauceror or not. Is this also the case when you cast pastamancer spells? Has anyone ever permed Ray or some other pasta spell, and tried maxing out damage as another class to see what happens? Satisfy my curiosity so I don't have to perm the skills myself.  :) --Kazim 20:11, 7 July 2007 (CDT)

Too much damage

I'm not sure how or where to put this, You call forth a Ray of Snowballs, which hits your opponent for 422 damage. You find it very difficult to control the Ray, and stuff sort of goes everywhere.

  • What did you have equipped? Keep in mind that +elemental spell damage is unaffected by the cap (i.e. +10 hot spell damage vs. +10 spell damage). With a chefstaff and a really expensive necklace, against an elementally weak foe that much damage is possible.--DoctorWorm 13:48, 29 November 2007 (CST)