Talk:Mummy wrapping

From TheKolWiki
Jump to: navigation, search


Combos

I bought up a whole bunch and tried some of the more obvious number denominations in hopes of a familiar or something. Using 25, 42, 50, and 100 all yield nothing. Anybody else willing to spade possible other numbers? --Nightvol 13:41, 26 June 2007 (CDT)

I tried 1-61 and no luck--Bwee 20:30, 26 June 2007 (CDT)

Looks like someone else tried through 77. I tried 78-127, nothing. --xcorvis 08:59, 11 July 2007 (CDT)

I also tested a few key numbers (5,7, 25, 50, 99-101) while wearing the mummy hat and pants, but no change. --xcorvis 09:02, 11 July 2007 (CDT)

Tested from 127 to 154 and got nothing. Probably safe to assume there's just the three items. Mr. Blonde 03:11, 18 July 2007 (CDT)


No outfit? --jeremypv 21:32, 8 August 2007 (CDT)

  • Not yet. On a radio show from a while ago, Jick expressed the desire to make a mummy outfit, but that it'll probably be a while. --Quietust (t|c) 21:49, 8 August 2007 (CDT)

I've tested upto 430 now with no combinations past those already known, I think it's pretty safe to say there's no more items made out of the wrappings --Denarius 19:46, 8 September 2007 (CDT)

i was wondering if everyone whose been testing has torso awargness available?--T.max 21:27, 24 September 2007 (CDT)

There's a rather conspicuous gap in the item numbers, right after gauze shorts. I wouldn't be shocked if there was another item, quite possibly a shirt. --Starwed 01:01, 25 September 2007 (CDT)

Unless I screwed up somewhere, there doesn't seem to be a shirt. I did all my testing with TA and couldn't find anything. It does feel like there should be another item to make an outfit though... --Denarius 06:59, 25 September 2007 (CDT)

I suppose it's possible that another item was planned but never actually implemented. --Starwed 15:08, 27 September 2007 (CDT)
Update... Just tested up to 32 with TA, still no shirt. Gront 00:15, 19 January 2008 (CST)

mmkay, should we mention here the whole gauze hammock mystery? It seems that the spading here is not done!--T.max 05:24, 11 October 2007 (CDT)

Would someone like to reformat this to match the Hugo's Weaving Manual page? While it's a bit difficult to read at first, it presents more information a lot more concisely and reduces the need for tabbing (which is always good) or making numerous new windows (if in older versions of i.e., which would be really good for some users).--Lukarnis 15:24, 30 June 2009 (UTC)