Talk:Fairy gravy boat
Yeah, it would be an updated fairy gravy. It also seems the description is supposed to be a haiku, but the linebreak is in the wrong place. fairy gravy boat / for your number one baby / Baby for gravy! --Aardvark (Talk | Contribs) 23:15, 30 January 2008 (CST)
Spoilers?
Isn't having "Also used to get past the first lavatory troll during the Slay Your Nemesis Quest." considered a spoiler and should be only on 'quest' pages?
PinothyJ 16:41, 13 January 2007 (CST)…
- Well, this is a spoiler site... Anyway, I don't think that it's ever been a rule of the wiki to exclude spoilers from item pages and only have them on quest pages. Actually, just every quest (even the Naughty Sorceress Quest) is spoiled partly in individual item pages *SPOILER WARNING* (such as spider web, which also coincidently spoils a different quest). --TheDotGamer 17:05, 13 January 2007 (CST)
Why is meat stack listed under uses? --Dalgar 22:54, 23 January 2007 (CST)
- Because you can make a meat stack by combining fairy gravy and meat from yesterday.--SomeStranger (t|c) 23:13, 23 January 2007 (CST)
Has this item been renamed to "fairy gravy boat"? That's the name of the item I recieved from the Haiku Dungeon adventure instead of plain "fairy gravy".--Metronomed 17:37, 30 January 2008 (CST)
- When searching in the mall it is listed as "fairy gravy" but when you look at the item description it is indeed "fairy gravy boat", the description has also changed to "for[sic] your number one baby. Baby for gravy!" I don't know if we should proceed to edit the page yet. --Tripwood 17:48, 30 January 2008 (CST)
Bagatelle, what about people who want to know what the old item description was? --Gigighost 21:07, 1 February 2008 (CST)
- Descriptions have changed on lots of items and it hasn't really been a standard to keep them. That I can recall, on pages where they have been noted, it's been put in the notes/history fields, and if you care that much, you are free to add them there. Aside from which all renamed pages are supposed to be moved, exactly like this one should have been. I also note that no-one complained about the other recent updates, this and this for example. --Bagatelle 21:19, 1 February 2008 (CST)
I don't remember what the old description was, but this new one is definitely a reference to the Sifl and Olly song "Gravy for Baby" --Sirjeffreyofvistledorf 23:57, 7 April 2008 (CDT)