Template talk:INFOBOX Location
From TheKolWiki
Documentation
Notes on conditionals: To determine if a parameter is defined, use #ifeq to compare the values of
and
Since they have different default values, they'll be unequal if param is defined, and of equal if it is.
Because of the syntax for #ifeq, you have to use | for table pipes inside the expression.
--Starwed 09:42, 26 October 2006 (CDT)
- Actually, there's a much easier way - just do {{#if:{{{param|}}}|value if defined|value if not defined}}. --Quietust (t|c) 12:49, 26 October 2006 (CDT)
- Ah, I was confused by meta.wikmedia.org's page on parserfunctions, then, which states that "For compatibility with older templates #if: cannot directly distinguish defined and undefined parameter values, it's a shorthand for a comparison with the empty string." Glad to see there is a less obscure way. :) (Also, the captcha seems to be broken, preventing external links from being posted.) --Starwed 01:56, 27 October 2006 (CDT)
- Technically, their note is correct, but in this case we probably don't need to distinguish between a blank value and an omitted field. If we do need to tell them apart, then the easiest way is to do {{#ifeq:{{{param|undefined}}}|undefined|value if not defined|value if defined}} and just reserve some value for "undefined" (the method you posted originally is effectively the same thing, only it doesn't rely on reserving a value for "undefined"). --Quietust (t|c) 16:58, 6 November 2006 (CST)
So, I placed it on some zones... we have to make the ML row optional. I don't know how to do it. Can anyone please? :) --Guissmo 01:04, 19 November 2006 (CST)
Discussion
Parameters
Starting a brainstorm list of candidates for inclusion. For what it's worth, I think monster level is probably more testable than safe moxie, and provides a better metric for the difficulty of an area. --Starwed 04:20, 17 October 2006 (CDT)
Added two dummy variables to illustrate how a longer iBox will look. --Starwed 02:16, 25 October 2006 (CDT)
Basic stuff which should absolutely be included:
- Name
- Location
- Ratio of combat/noncombat
- Minimum stat to adventure here
Simple stuff which should probably be included:
- Ultra rare adventure
- Clover adventure
Stuff which could possibly be included:
- Safe moxie
- Information on monster level
- When it unlocks
- Info on what types of elemental monsters appear
- Which quests are related to this area
- Outfits or effects which affect adventures here
- Question on ML. Should we use the ML for all common encounters? For example The Spooky Forest has a ML of 5 for all encounters but the Baiowolf. Should we just say 5-5, and leave it at that, or include the possibility of the Baiowolf? I was thinking no, as it's an ultra-rare, but I was hoping to get some consensus.--Toffile 02:15, 19 November 2006 (CST)
- It should be whatever is most useful for players; so ultra-rares should probably be excluded. (Or at most, displayed parenthetically) --Starwed 04:50, 20 November 2006 (CST)
Is there any reason why the area number is not included? (For an effect similar to item or effect pages). It's not the most necessary thing but I do know that at least I would find it useful. --TheDotGamer 07:41, 18 January 2007 (CST)
- Because I didn't even know that areas had a number? ^_^ I certainly don't see any reason not to include it. --Starwed 14:59, 18 January 2007 (CST)
The area number still hasnt been included... Any plans to fix this? Discordance 15:46, 29 June 2007 (CDT)
- Rather a long time ago, I went through and added the number to the Data pages. But I could never find a place to put it in the infobox that looked decent. I'll take another stab at it later, I guess; feel free to make suggestions. --Starwed 05:55, 30 June 2007 (CDT)
Thanks, some other templates on the wiki include categories like template:adventuretop can we add category location to this one too? Discordance 07:30, 30 June 2007 (CDT)
Some changes
I made a few changes to the template, would appreciate some feeback:
- Added a link to edit the data page at the bottom of the box. Is the font too small? Is its position ok?
- Added a field for semi-rare adventures.
- Since there are also fields for badmoon, clover, and ultrarare adventures, reorganized the fields so that all "special adventures" fall into a subsection of the infobox. Does this look ok?
- I still didn't see a place I liked to insert the location number; it doesn't seem important enough to have it's own field, but perhaps others disagree?
--Starwed 07:54, 8 August 2007 (CDT)
|