Talk:Elements

From TheKolWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Should this be a page? Sometimes we make the category description short and have a separate page describing it in full and sometimes we don't. When do we do which?--Dehstil (t|c) 20:55, 3 July 2006 (CDT)

Does it seem to anyone but me that the relationships between the elements could be a reference to or could have originated from "Rock Paper Scissors Spock Lizard," (http://www.samkass.com/theories/RPSSL.html) ? On the asymmetric website there is a javascript version of the game mentioned above... so... hence the suspicions. --Lord Grumbles 23:10, 11 November 2006 (CST)

Do elemental resistances compound each other? Or, what are the rules if you, say, have one item which gives you slight resistance against Sleeze, and another that gives So-So against sleeze, and wear both? Kvn8907 21:22, 4 February 2007 (CST)

  • The first item gives +1 sleaze resistance, and the 2nd one gives +2 sleaze resistance - the net result would be +3 sleaze resistance. --Quietust (t|c) 21:28, 4 February 2007 (CST)

Do we want to talk about "cute" here? I found the Sixth Element quest an uproarious laugh, and think it should get a tidbit message in the notes. --Azeltir 01:43, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

If "cute" is mentioned at all, it should only be to say that it is explicitly not an element. The same way that "bad spelling" and "slime" and "shadow" are not elements.--P4n1q 02:09, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

I agree with both of these, cute should be in the "other elements" section. I mean, cute is the associated element of Accordion thieves, after all. Speaking of, how about a shout out to the associated elements (level 13 skill/hobo area)?--Tray 05:31, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Clicking on slime takes you to the page for the monster, not the "element". We need a page on the element. --Starguy 21:21, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Does the double-ice box work the same way as the other cookbooks for overriding skills? I was going to add it in but I haven't spaded it. --Magoo 14:23, 30 October 2011 (CET)

MTG

  • reading southwest's reason for removing the MTG reference, it's not that the image is the same, it's that the colours of the elements and their relative positions are unnecessarily similar. i was always puzzled as to why spooky came between hot and cold. now i know. --Evilkolbot (talk) 13:26, 29 December 2014 (UTC)